1. Dashboard
  2. Artikel
  3. Mitglieder
    1. Letzte Aktivitäten
    2. Benutzer online
    3. Team
    4. Mitgliedersuche
  4. Forum
  • Anmelden
  • Registrieren
  • Suche
Dieses Thema
  • Alles
  • Dieses Thema
  • Dieses Forum
  • Forum
  • Artikel
  • Seiten
  • Erweiterte Suche
  1. eishockeyforum.com
  2. ICE Hockey League
  3. Allgemeines

Double standards for Austrian and non Austrian clubs

  • urosg
  • 14. Januar 2011 um 12:40
1. offizieller Beitrag
  • urosg
    Nationalliga
    • 14. Januar 2011 um 12:40
    • #1

    Hockey fans here in Slovenia are extremely frustrated with the continuous Austrian sided referree decisions. More and more people believe that these referree decisions are supported and sometimes even encoureged by the league itself who wants to have all Austrian clubs in the playoffs. Then there's the also the disciplinary commission with unreasonably severe suspensions for players of non-austrian clubs (Alba case & Hebar, etc.). All Slovenian hockey fans also rememberer the 2007/08 season where with the momentum they had, Olimpija began the final series against Salzburg in style, taking a 3–1 lead and standing just one step from the trophy. Then, out of the blue and barely two hours before the crucial fifth match, came the news that "due to an administrative error, Olimpija is stripped of the third win".

    There are more and more hockey fans who no longer go to the EBEL games and there are more and more people who think Jesenice and Olimpija should left EBEL and make a seperate league with Medvescak, Sapa, Partizan and some other Slovenian and Hungarian teams, and maybe also with Italian clubs.

    I am huge EBEL fan, i think EBEL is the best possible league for all of us, fans, players and sponsors, so i really hope this scenario won't happen, but i do think that EBEL must react as soon as possible and make the necessery steps to ensure equall treatment for non-Austrian clubs in the league. I still believe that equall standards for non Austrian clubs is what EBEL truly strives for, but i'm in the distinct minority here.

  • Henke
    NHL
    • 14. Januar 2011 um 12:46
    • #2

    come on write those in charge an e-mail. show them your complaints. post the mail on here.

    coming along with the final salzburg vs laibach (played back in the days) is just ridiculous. i would not mentioned it in your mail if i were you.

    good luck.

  • stringer
    Nationalliga
    • 14. Januar 2011 um 12:59
    • #3

    da fällt mir nur eins ein : reisende soll man nicht aufhalten bzw. don't make the leopard change its spots [winke]

    manch einer, hat schon einen starken verfolgungswahn :wall:

  • DerFremde
    Gast
    • 14. Januar 2011 um 13:04
    • #4
    Zitat von urosg

    Then, out of the blue and barely two hours before the crucial fifth match, came the news that "due to an administrative error, Olimpija is stripped of the third win".

    Out of the blue? If they'd read the rule book and did some basic math they could've kept their win.

    Zitat


    Then there's the also the disciplinary commission with unreasonably severe suspensions for players of non-austrian clubs (Alba case & Hebar, etc.).

    What about Abids suspension? What abaout Raffls? Weren't they severe looking at what they did (or actually didn't do)? Yes they were. So it's not some obscure racist judgment by the Strafsenat as you'd like to see it.
    And Hebar got what he deserved (and what he was begging for by going berserk). If he can't control himself and tries to severely injure a helpless player laying on the floor then he shouldn't be allowed to play hockey at all.

  • Nussi
    NHL
    • 14. Januar 2011 um 13:09
    • #5

    Na dann packts eure Koffer und baba

  • Online
    exkju
    EBEL
    • 14. Januar 2011 um 13:16
    • #6

    do hungarian and fans from slowenia watch games between austrian teams (villach - linz, graz - vienna) ?
    gues what - the whole league is frustrated about the refererres. their decisions are not onesided, their decisions are only around the whole league ridiculous.
    I am from Linz and I'm watching the Blackwings for 7 years and every season there are about 10-15 home matches where referres turn the matches/the momentum around because of bad calls.
    I have seen referress calling off clear goals after 5min watching the situation on video, I have seen players punished for the bending/curve they have on top of their sticks in the overtime of playoffgames and so on.
    The whole league complains about referrees and every team has to live with bad decisions of referrees. So its not onesided, they are only dumb.
    Just watch games between austrian teams more often and you will notice that this is not a fact of beeing a foreign team.
    Concerning the Strafsenat you are right, there were really bad decisions and it often were decisions against Jesenice, Zagreb and so on...
    but not only !
    the Strafsenat is a huge topic for austrian fans too, it is a organisation with bad decisions and very unflexible (when you see the fact, that they are not allowed to punish players that are already punished during the game with 2+2min, that they don't research on their own and so on)
    I'm sure that there is going to be a reorganisation of Strafsenat next year, but as i said - the whole league is complaining about them, its not onesided.
    I have a buddy from america: his first question about Linz and hockey was, what is wrong with our referrees :D
    you are right when you say that foreign teams should be treated equally, but they are...
    I can give you numberous examples out of the past 10 years with decisions against linz which i have never heard and seen before in the NHL or DEL or other europeon leagues and i assume fans from other austrian clubs can do the same.

    *edit*
    yeah my english is under all pig and not the yellow from the egg but it goes :D

    Einmal editiert, zuletzt von experion (14. Januar 2011 um 13:22)

  • Hanz82
    EBEL
    • 14. Januar 2011 um 13:17
    • #7
    Zitat von Nussi

    Na dann packts eure Koffer und baba

    Bravo...sehr hoch ist dein Niveau von debatte [keks] :thumbdown:

  • coach
    YNWA
    • 14. Januar 2011 um 13:19
    • #8
    Zitat von experion

    do hungarian and fans from slowenia watch games between austrian teams (villach - linz, graz - vienna) ?
    gues what - the whole league is frustrated about the refererres. their decisions are not onesided, their decisions are only around the whole league ridiculous.


    :thumbup:
    maybe they will understand this ...

  • Hanz82
    EBEL
    • 14. Januar 2011 um 13:24
    • #9
    Zitat von w.p.14


    :thumbup:
    maybe they will understand this ...

    Maybe HE will understand :D ...ich habe schon ein paar spiele von nonOestereichischen teams gesehn (auch Red_power,MiBa und Plevc) [winke]

  • ofiskaa
    Wir sind die Caps!
    • 14. Januar 2011 um 13:28
    • #10

    In Norway there are 10 norwegian teams with norwegian referees and Strafensat. Guess what: All 10 teams are complaining.

    Dont blame others for your mistakes. Chin up and get on with it.

    And believe it or not, EBEL refs are much better than norwegian refs in general.

  • cappin0
    NHL
    • 14. Januar 2011 um 13:30
    • #11

    ich finde es schön wenn über unregelmässigkeiten debattiert wird:
    " dass unsere referee's nicht das beste sind, wissen wir alle ( ;) ), dass jeder von uns die richtige entscheidung treffen würde ist auch klar, nur, die ligaverantwortlichen hören nicht auf uns. wer ist schuld?
    das klima?, die überdrüber fans?, ET ?, "

    Jungs von den nichtösterreichischen Klubs, kommt wieder auf den Boden zurück, begrabt euren Verfolgungswahn, auch eure Klubchefs sitzen bei den Ligaverhandlungen, dort sollen sie ihre ansichten auf den Tisch legen.

    Wir Fans können daran nichts ändern, nichtmehrindiehallegehen schadet nur dem Verein.

  • Elbart
    Gast
    • 14. Januar 2011 um 14:05
    • #12
    Zitat von experion

    I have seen players punished for the bending/curve they have on top of their sticks in the overtime of playoffgames and so on.


    So some rules shouldn't be enforced because the infractions happen in overtime of play-off-games?

  • Online
    exkju
    EBEL
    • 14. Januar 2011 um 14:12
    • #13

    in dem fall war die strafe damals schon eigenartig, da sie durch das gegnerische Team erwirkt wurde.
    der schiri hätte das niemals von selber überprüft, die villacher wussten damals halt das salfi so einen stick hat, zumal er das jahr zuvor noch bei ihnen spielte :D
    korrekt, sicher, aber die wie oft wird ne Strafe gepfiffen wegen unkorrekter Krümmung des Schlägers und wenn das dann noch auf Hinwirken des gegnerischen teams überprüft wird, werde ich den Verdacht net los, dass es da nur drum ging damals das powerplay der Linzer irgendwie zu beenden und die Schiris haben da reingespielt.
    Schlechtes Beispiel weils natürlich korrekt geeahndet wurde, aber kurios - auf jeden Fall ;)

  • Hanz82
    EBEL
    • 14. Januar 2011 um 14:28
    • #14
    Zitat von cappin0

    ich finde es schön wenn über unregelmässigkeiten debattiert wird:
    " dass unsere referee's nicht das beste sind, wissen wir alle ( ;) ), dass jeder von uns die richtige entscheidung treffen würde ist auch klar, nur, die ligaverantwortlichen hören nicht auf uns. wer ist schuld?
    das klima?, die überdrüber fans?, ET ?, "

    Jungs von den nichtösterreichischen Klubs, kommt wieder auf den Boden zurück, begrabt euren Verfolgungswahn, auch eure Klubchefs sitzen bei den Ligaverhandlungen, dort sollen sie ihre ansichten auf den Tisch legen.

    Wir Fans können daran nichts ändern, nichtmehrindiehallegehen schadet nur dem Verein.

    :thumbup: :thumbup: [prost]

  • Online
    gm99
    Biertrinker
    • 14. Januar 2011 um 14:34
    • #15
    Zitat von experion

    in dem fall war die strafe damals schon eigenartig, da sie durch das gegnerische Team erwirkt wurde.
    der schiri hätte das niemals von selber überprüft, die villacher wussten damals halt das salfi so einen stick hat, zumal er das jahr zuvor noch bei ihnen spielte :D
    korrekt, sicher, aber die wie oft wird ne Strafe gepfiffen wegen unkorrekter Krümmung des Schlägers und wenn das dann noch auf Hinwirken des gegnerischen teams überprüft wird, werde ich den Verdacht net los, dass es da nur drum ging damals das powerplay der Linzer irgendwie zu beenden und die Schiris haben da reingespielt.Schlechtes Beispiel weils natürlich korrekt geeahndet wurde, aber kurios - auf jeden Fall ;)

    Na, du gefallst mir: Der Schiedsrichter muss ja nach IIHF-Rule 260 über Beschwerde des gegnerischen Kapitäns den Stock nachmessen und bei berechtigter Beschwerde eine Strafe aussprechen. Wäre die Beschwerde seitens des VSV unberechtigt gewesen, hätte der Schiedsrichter gegen Villach eine 2-Minuten-Strafe bzw. in der Overtime sogar einen Penalty-Shot verhängen müssen (260 d bzw. g)

  • Ingo
    Nationalliga
    • 14. Januar 2011 um 14:35
    • #16
    Zitat von experion

    in dem fall war die strafe damals schon eigenartig, da sie durch das gegnerische Team erwirkt wurde.

    Zitat

    260 - MEASUREMENT OF EQUIPMENT
    a) The Referee may, at any time and at his own discretion, measure any equipment.

    b) The Captain of a team may make a formal complaint against specific dimension of any equipment. The Referee shall make the necessary measurement immediately.However, no goal shall be disallowed as a result of any measurement.

    c) If the complaint is not sustained, the requesting team shall be penalized with a Bench
    Minor penalty (see Rule 555)

    d) If the complaint is sustained, the guilty player shall be penalized with a Minor penalty
    (see Rule 555)

    e) Such request shall be limited to one team at any stoppage of play.

    Also ganz regulär, dass das gegnerische Team das fordert. Pech, wenn sie seinen Trick gekannt haben, aber 100% regelkonform.

  • Online
    exkju
    EBEL
    • 14. Januar 2011 um 14:45
    • #17

    ok alles schön und gut, ich sagte doch bereits dass es regelkonform ist
    es kommt nur praktisch nie vor und ich seh den sinn hinter der regel nicht so recht, warum man da 2min aussprechen muss.
    im wesentlichen ist es eine regel mit der man das spiel was auf der kippe steht noch spannend machen kann, wenn ein team über einen ex-spieler über insiderwissen verfügt.
    2min vor schluss wenn man 2:3 hinten ist, ist es halt ganz praktisch wenn man noch ein powerplay bekommt weil man seine pappenheimer und deren stockvorlieben aus der letzten season kennt und wenn man weiss dass der spieler seinen stock net gewechselt hat, auch ne ziemlich sichere nummer.
    villach war net bedroht 2min zu bekommen, da die spieler ja eben genau
    diesen stock von salfi aus der vergangenen season kannten, da es der
    gleiche stock war, aber egal.
    mein ansatz wäre da halt, dem betreffenden spieler ne 10min diszi. (persönliche strafe statt teamstrafe) zu geben und nen anderen stock in die hand zu drücken
    aber egal, schweifen wird net vom thema ab, ich sagte bereits dass es ein schlechtes bsp ist und dass es damals regelkonform war.

    back to topic

  • Elbart
    Gast
    • 14. Januar 2011 um 14:51
    • #18

    Nein, passt schon zum Thema, diese Täter/Opfer-Umkehrung.

  • Online
    exkju
    EBEL
    • 14. Januar 2011 um 15:00
    • #19

    naja es geht darum dass die fans ausländischer teams der meinung sind, dass sie benachteiligt werden von schiedsrichtern/strafsenat.
    der strafsenat ist mMn dringend reformbedürftig, weil es ein unflexibles konstrukt ist und unzusammenhängende entscheidungen trifft oder eben nicht trifft. Das Ding ist, das weiß man eigentlich schon ne ganze Weile, wenn ich da an die doch zahlreichen Sperren in den Playoff denke.
    Ich bin gespannt auf die diesjährigen Playoff, denn da könnte es gut und gern wieder zu einem ordentlichen Rucksack an Sperren kommen, wenn man sich ansieht wie die Season bisher verlief, aber naja regular season und post season zu vergleichen macht wohl erst nach den playoff sinn - wie heissts so schön: in den playoff gelten eigene gesetze, hoffentlich stellt sich der strafsenat da durch seine entscheidungen nicht so in den mittelpunkt wie er es bereits jetzt während der season macht.

    was die leistungen der schiedsrichter betrifft, die sind in allen Hallen schlecht.
    Der großteil der Fans ist natürlich davon überzeugt das eigene Team wird am Meisten oder Öftesten benachteiligt.
    Das ist Blödsinn, es kann schon sein dass es ne Folge von schlechten Entscheidungen gibt, die ein team ein paarmal betreffen, aber am Ende der Season gleicht sich das denke ich ganz gut wie oft man benachteiligt wurde und wie oft man von Benachteiligungen der gegnerischen teams mal profitiert.
    Momentan schwenkt das Pegel halt vielleicht ein bissl gegen ausländische Teams aus, es kommt aber wieder zurück, denn das haben Pegel so ansich.
    Bzw. dass es ausschwenkt gegen ausländische Teams ist vielleicht auch in dem Fall nur eine subjektive Meinung der ausländischen Fans.
    Wie gesagt, das eigene Team wird immer am Meisten benachteiligt....
    Faktum ist, das die Schiedsrichterleistungen in der ganzen Liga unter aller Sau sind. Du hast jeden Spieltag Spiele dabei, wo Schiedsrichter spielentscheidend eingreifen...
    das wird sich aber auch nicht so schnell ändern, denn andere Schiedsrichter wirds nicht recht spielen.
    nächste Season sollte sich aber zumindest beim Strafsenat was tun, das würd ich mir schon wünschen.

  • R.Bourque
    KHL
    • 14. Januar 2011 um 15:13
    • #20
    Zitat von Henke

    come on write those in charge an e-mail. show them your complaints. post the mail on here.

    coming along with the final salzburg vs laibach (played back in the days) is just ridiculous. i would not mentioned it in your mail if i were you.

    good luck.


    to get this one back on topic. I'd do as henke says. There's a feedback-thing here: here free for everyone to use. You want to get something done, voice your concern, If the people there receive ten mails telling them they're all fascists and some more insults, that's not gonna get anything done. If you've got footage on anything, i know for a fact that people ther ewill look into it. Thing is, you gotta remain constructive even though it hurts do be robbed of a very import win ( no question that jesenice was in Klagenfurt)

    this saturday, there's a presidents meeting. The president are those guys in the big cars with money and stuff like that. If people would address those guys, telling them they don't want to see hockey with bloody stupid, short/mixed/weak-eyed referees, they'll go into the President's meeting to discuss that. And they won't discuss about other issues, because the'll fear for their team's support.

    complaining on a message board is ok, but it won't get anything done.

    edit: the same applies for the performances of the disciplinary commission. They need rights. The right to revoke a decision. Like they actually did in the Lysak-case by tricking. They should have the right to revoke every wrong decision at ref made. and they should bloody well be paid, so's they've got time to actiall ydo that job and watch EBEL-match DVDs day in day out. Write to the league. or write to your presidents.

  • urosg
    Nationalliga
    • 14. Januar 2011 um 16:17
    • #21

    Well, i don't want to argue with anyone here. If some of you guys would like to see Austrian-only EBEL then this is your legitimate wish. If you ask me, that would be a huge step back for the league itself and also for the hockey in this part of Europe and also for the hockey in Austria. I think that a true hockey fan would only wish EBEL to expand further, i think Bolzano, Feldkirch, Innsbruck would be a great additions.

    As i said, i am a big EBEL fan, in the last 4 seasons i watched over around 100 EBEL games between only Austrian clubs (i got torrents of the Premiere games on cifnation, diwana and 5minsforfighting), and i really know a lot about this league. I know that referrees are generally pretty poor (there are a few bright exceptions like Schimm and Berneker), i know that KAC and Salzburg have a "special status" (pretty much like Real and Barcelona in La Liga), i know everything about Olimpija's administrative error in 2007/08 finals, i even wrote an extensive article about it: http://www.rtvslo.si/blog/urosq/hok…2008-03-26/8786

    I believe that equal standards for non Austrian clubs is what EBEL truly strives for, but not enough has been done in this area. In fact I 100% with this post on IH forums: "While I do not doubt anymore that there is a double standard in refereeing in the league I can not imagine and do not see any evidence that this is the consequence of a deliberate plan by someone and that the refs are ordered to whistle against non-Austrian teams as you claim.
    It is much more plausible to me that in general the suspicious refs and the also disciplinary committee members (or a majority thereof) have a subtle disposition of the league being "our party" which causes them to be biased in an more or less sub-conscious way."

  • DerFremde
    Gast
    • 14. Januar 2011 um 16:29
    • #22
    Zitat von urosg

    i know that KAC and Salzburg have a "special status"

    So what about Abid and Raffl? If we have some kind of "special status" why had we two players banned for 3 resp. 6 games for pretty much nothing?

  • Online
    exkju
    EBEL
    • 14. Januar 2011 um 16:37
    • #23

    in the past years there were no huge match penalties and huge decisions against non austrian teams, but i remember the trattnig case and the discussion about it and so on.
    most of the huge penalties concerned austrian teams in the past years, this year is different and everyone thinks its a subtitle vendetta or something like that.
    when you were really watching austria-austria ebel games in the past years than you know that it is equall, because there have been many bad decisions in the past years against austrian teams and players too.

    and when i watch that, i cannot see a any preference of teams from jesenice, zagreb and so on get match penalties more often than austrian teams do:
    http://www.eishockey.at/erste-bank-ehl/statistik/fairplay - its pretty equal and numbers don't lie.
    penalties are not a reason for the status of the teams in the ranking as you can see.

    sometimes your team is in favour of bad decisions and sometimes not. but if your team doesn't make it into the playoff, then search the problem in avoiding goals or scoring ability, because at the end of the season bad referree-decisions are more or less equal between all teams.
    i remember matches in linz were lublijana won because of bad referree-decisions - so what ? sometimes you are lucky because of bad decisions and sometimes your opponent is the lucky one because of the bad decisions.
    the problem is that the standard is really really low talking about our referrees and that is the problem and its not only a "non-austrian-teams problem".
    just read this messageboard. in nearly every game the referrees are a topic...
    I have also seen a lot of games where the referrees decisions are pro non austrian teams, i have seen austrian team loosing to foreign teams because of referree decisions in Linz, Vienna, Villach and so on ... that also happens, don't forget about that...
    in the end of the season thats all unimportant because of equal bad decisions and what really matters is scoring abilty and the skill of avoiding goals.

    but this leads nowhere.
    most of the fans complaining in hungarian, croatian... messageboards don't watch austria-austria matches and every fan thinks his team is worst-treated team by the referrees. of course they do, because they want to see that !
    thats a easy way out of the problem why your home-team is in the ranking where it is or why you lost an important game - the referrees are pro-opponent is very easy, especially when you are not knowing what goes in the rest of the league and see bad decisions in other games too...
    thats how i see it and my last posting on this topic (because i have to go watch linz against graz :D - hopefully without bad referree-decisions what i really doubt :cursing: )

    8 Mal editiert, zuletzt von experion (14. Januar 2011 um 17:24)

  • sicsche
    Nightfall
    • 14. Januar 2011 um 16:47
    • #24

    @Urosq
    I completelly agree with you that an austrian only or something like that EBEL will be a step back and we have to expand the league slowly.
    And yes referess and committee have to improve. But i think its not fair to everybody involved to say that there is a double standard, loopsided or something like this going on. In fact i think you are right that there are some ppl working for the league beeing part of this hardliners wanting an austria-only league back to 1950s style. The only way to solve this (and here is the keypoint where you cant put all the shame to the involved ppl but also your own club boss'): is installing pro referess and a full time job committee. Does it cost money? sure. It is expensive? to a degree. But in a league throwing around millions of euros every season, this cant be an argument. Austrian clubs and non austrian clubs have to install this professional level of administration and refererring to the league to be successful.

    Does it kill every wrong decision or someone thinking the calls dont come his way? you will allways have this effect. Take a look to the nhl where all this is on a very high professionall level and you still hear ppl complaining and canadian and low-market teams crying about unfair decisions. But if this are ppl earning there money this way and have time to practice, study and be prepared for the work to be done it increases the standards necessary.

    @DerFremde
    Please stop crying around. You are like a broken lp repeating himself again and again and again and ....

  • DerFremde
    Gast
    • 14. Januar 2011 um 16:50
    • #25
    Zitat von sicsche

    @Urosq
    @DerFremde
    Please stop crying around. You are like a broken lp repeating himself again and again and again and ....

    I'm not crying around. I'd just appreciate an answer to my question how those supsensions fit into the concept of non-austrian teams being robbed by the Strafesenat. And neither of the whining "non-austrians" has provided one so far. So I'll keep asking.

  1. Datenschutzerklärung
  2. Impressum
Community-Software: WoltLab Suite™